<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: HOW TO TAKE CARE OF YOURSELF                              WITHOUT BEING SELFISH	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://madelaineweiss.com/how-to-take-care-of-yourself-without-being-selfish/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://madelaineweiss.com/how-to-take-care-of-yourself-without-being-selfish/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=how-to-take-care-of-yourself-without-being-selfish</link>
	<description>Board Certified Executive, Career, Life Coach, Licensed Psychotherapist</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2020 23:50:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Madelaine Weiss		</title>
		<link>https://madelaineweiss.com/how-to-take-care-of-yourself-without-being-selfish/#comment-133</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Madelaine Weiss]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2020 23:50:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://madelaineweiss.com/?p=3103#comment-133</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://madelaineweiss.com/how-to-take-care-of-yourself-without-being-selfish/#comment-132&quot;&gt;Steven Nisenbaum&lt;/a&gt;.

Actually, glad you brought up Sartre. I did a little digging once and found an interpretation suggesting that other people are hell, not because of what&#039;s wrong with them, but rather because what we can see through their eyes is wrong with us. I put this in my book. The other quote that you will know and like is, Kahneman&#039;s, &quot;We all care intensely for the narrative of our own life and very  much want it to be a good story, with a decent hero. Becker like, isn&#039;t it Dr, N.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://madelaineweiss.com/how-to-take-care-of-yourself-without-being-selfish/#comment-132">Steven Nisenbaum</a>.</p>
<p>Actually, glad you brought up Sartre. I did a little digging once and found an interpretation suggesting that other people are hell, not because of what&#8217;s wrong with them, but rather because what we can see through their eyes is wrong with us. I put this in my book. The other quote that you will know and like is, Kahneman&#8217;s, &#8220;We all care intensely for the narrative of our own life and very  much want it to be a good story, with a decent hero. Becker like, isn&#8217;t it Dr, N.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Steven Nisenbaum		</title>
		<link>https://madelaineweiss.com/how-to-take-care-of-yourself-without-being-selfish/#comment-132</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Nisenbaum]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2020 23:41:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://madelaineweiss.com/?p=3103#comment-132</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Existentialists posited human consciousness defined as pure being-for-itself set against all else that is being-in-itself.  In this philosophical tradition argument, being-for-others is seen as a burden of being-for-itself. Although trying to achieve distance from limitations and ambiguities flowing from the subject-object dichotomy, ironically what emerges is arguably a still ruggedly individualistic and &quot;self-centered&quot; stance.  This was famously captured by Jean-Paul Sartre in his book Nausea with the disclosure (assertion? revelation? conclusion?) that &quot;Hell is other people.&quot; I am touched by the observation of your admiring companion on the  Camino de Santiago when he commented, &quot;I like how you take care of yourself, and the other person, too.&quot;  Reconciliation need not be impossible, and complementary is perhaps a choice.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Existentialists posited human consciousness defined as pure being-for-itself set against all else that is being-in-itself.  In this philosophical tradition argument, being-for-others is seen as a burden of being-for-itself. Although trying to achieve distance from limitations and ambiguities flowing from the subject-object dichotomy, ironically what emerges is arguably a still ruggedly individualistic and &#8220;self-centered&#8221; stance.  This was famously captured by Jean-Paul Sartre in his book Nausea with the disclosure (assertion? revelation? conclusion?) that &#8220;Hell is other people.&#8221; I am touched by the observation of your admiring companion on the  Camino de Santiago when he commented, &#8220;I like how you take care of yourself, and the other person, too.&#8221;  Reconciliation need not be impossible, and complementary is perhaps a choice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Madelaine Weiss		</title>
		<link>https://madelaineweiss.com/how-to-take-care-of-yourself-without-being-selfish/#comment-131</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Madelaine Weiss]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2020 23:31:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://madelaineweiss.com/?p=3103#comment-131</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://madelaineweiss.com/how-to-take-care-of-yourself-without-being-selfish/#comment-130&quot;&gt;Karen Gross&lt;/a&gt;.

Ah yes, good point, how right you are, it is a circle. Everything connected to everything else. Other point: there was a study on pets and their owners. Oxytocin levels found to be impacted by dogs and owners gazing into each other&#039;s eyes. Not kidding. Mentioned to a friend once who she said that dogs don&#039;t make eye contact. Mine does!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://madelaineweiss.com/how-to-take-care-of-yourself-without-being-selfish/#comment-130">Karen Gross</a>.</p>
<p>Ah yes, good point, how right you are, it is a circle. Everything connected to everything else. Other point: there was a study on pets and their owners. Oxytocin levels found to be impacted by dogs and owners gazing into each other&#8217;s eyes. Not kidding. Mentioned to a friend once who she said that dogs don&#8217;t make eye contact. Mine does!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Karen Gross		</title>
		<link>https://madelaineweiss.com/how-to-take-care-of-yourself-without-being-selfish/#comment-130</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Karen Gross]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2020 23:19:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://madelaineweiss.com/?p=3103#comment-130</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I think we need to both recognize and act on this idea: self care is not selfish.  We mistake one for the other.  In the absence of self care, we can’t care for others.  Another point: the Pandemic has frozen us in a sense; we are disconnected and lacking touch. One cure: get our empathy engines going.  That’s because caring for others is beneficial to helping oneself. Ah— a circle!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think we need to both recognize and act on this idea: self care is not selfish.  We mistake one for the other.  In the absence of self care, we can’t care for others.  Another point: the Pandemic has frozen us in a sense; we are disconnected and lacking touch. One cure: get our empathy engines going.  That’s because caring for others is beneficial to helping oneself. Ah— a circle!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
